While recent headlines have focused on the ongoing debate in Washington and around the country about immigration reform, very little attention has been given to the intersection between private, for-profit businesses and the detention of immigrants. We would like to share some important facts about profits and immigration policy in our country.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) follows a congressional mandate that the government must detain and house  34,000 immigrants each day. William Selway and Margaret Newkirk outline that this quota does not come cheap for taxpayers; each of those slots costs about $120 per day to keep filled. In total, the United States spends over $2 billion in taxpayer dollars a year to detain immigrants who are awaiting government action on their cases (which can take years). Over half of that amount – more than $1 billion – is spent on private prison facilities. Public financial information from the country’s largest private prison operators shows that the private prison industry is profiting from our country’s current immigration detention policies.

Does the current detention mandate make sense? Should private corporations that spend millions lobbying in Washington profit from the detainment of immigrants?

At Brownstein and Nguyen, we do not claim to have the answers to these policy questions. However, we have seen firsthand the often harsh effects of the government’s detention policies in the lives of honest, hard-working immigrants and the families who depend on them. We are proud to state that we have been able to help thousands of immigrants over the years who seek only a fair chance at a better life for themselves and their families in the United States.

Please do not hesitate to contact Brownstein and Nguyen, your Atlanta immigration law experts regarding immigration custody and detention and other immigration concerns. We have a proven track record of success, showing time and again that our knowledge and experience in immigration law provide clients with the best possible representation when they need it most.

For the past several years, immigration reform has been the subject of much political debate and maneuvering and a hot topic in the news. But to the millions of immigrants peacefully living and working, paying taxes and raising families in the United States, immigration reform is much more politics. Take a look at a recent article, regarding the story of Josue Noe Sandoval-Perez, and it is hard not to feel the gut wrenching pain that some of the current immigration enforcement practices place on families. In the midst of the headlines, and the current state of progress on immigration reform, it may seem that there is no hope. However, even under current law there is much that can be done to help immigrants wanting to make this country their home.

Citizens of foreign countries who seek to enter the United States generally must first obtain a U.S. visa. Visas fall into two main categories: non-immigrant visas and immigrant visas. For those wishing only to travel to, visit, or study abroad in the United States on a temporary basis, they would need to obtain a non-immigrant visa. If a non-U.S. citizen wishes to reside permanently in the United States, an immigrant visa would be necessary. There are numerous categories and methods of obtaining immigrant visas, or green cards, each with their own requirements. Generally, these categories include relative, spouse and finance’ visas, investor or employment visas, and various special circumstance visas. For more information about the various types of visas available, please click here.

For the past 20 years, the Atlanta, Georgia law firm of Brownstein & Nguyen has helped thousands of foreign citizens obtain visas to come and live in the United States. Founding attorney Tien G. Nguyen has the necessary expertise to help individuals and families with their visa needs, including visas and green cards, citizenship and naturalization, and removal/deportation. If you, a family member or someone you know needs expert advice or representation in immigration law, do not hesitate to call or contact our Atlanta, Georgia immigration law attorneys today for a free consultation.

Proponents on both sides of the immigration debate feel strongly about their respective positions.  However, there is one affected population who is largely without a voice and left out altogether – the children of deported immigrant parents.  While these helpless victims didn’t choose their citizenship or parentage, the current laws unintentionally sever their relationships with birth parents and create a barrier to future reunification for their families.

A new bill introduced in Congress last summer by Representative Lucille Roybal-Allard (D), to be co-sponsored by Karen Bass (D) when reintroduced in the next session, entitled H.R. 6128 – Help Separated Families Act of 2012, is intended to fix some of the problems with the current system. According to the Applied Research Center, more than 5,100 children were sent to foster care due to the detention or deportation of their immigrant parents in the first six months of 2011 alone. Foster care typically occurs without any consideration of placement with other family members, who frequently are themselves undocumented aliens and therefore deemed unacceptable guardians. Sadly, short of a foreign consulate getting involved, most of these children lose contact with their birth families for the rest of their lives after entering the child welfare system.

Perhaps even more disturbing is the fact that the Applied Research Center estimates that if current trends continue, we could see the number of innocent children separated from their families due to deportation and immigration detention swell to 15,000 or more over the next 5 years.

As written, the proposed bill sets standards for states ensuring that immigration status alone does not disqualify relatives, parents and legal guardians from being acceptable guardians for a child when they are the best fit. States seeking placement for a child will be required to notify relatives that their immigration status won’t be questioned, except to the extent necessary in determining eligibility for services and programs. It further requires states to accept foreign documentation as sufficient proof of identification for accomplishing the required criminal background checks for child placement. And finally, it puts the responsibility squarely on the shoulders of the state to ensure that every reasonable effort has been made (including working through foreign consulates) to notify birth parents and any relatives or extended family before the state can file for termination of parental rights.

In the current system, even after parents have been released and allowed to remain in the United States, the requirements to restore their custodial rights once their children have entered into the child welfare system are nearly impossible to attain given their immigration status.

While the new bill isn’t perfect, it is expected to go a long way towards keeping families together whenever possible. The bill as introduced has been endorsed by many national, regional and state child and family advocacy organizations.

If you have questions about immigration laws and rights, feel free to call Tien Nguyen of Brownstein Nguyen, LLC who specializes in the areas of immigration and family matters at (770) 458-9060, or email Tien at [email protected]. You can also find out more information at our website: https://bnlawatlanta.com.